\n 1<\/td>\n | To make payments\n<\/td>\n | To make payments\t<\/td>\n | To make payments\t<\/td>\n | To make payments\t<\/td>\n | To make payments\n<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n |
\n 2<\/td>\n | To check information on\nfood and beverage products<\/td>\n | To view restaurant\nmenu<\/td>\n | To check information on\nfood and beverage products<\/td>\n | To check product authenticity<\/td>\n | To check information on\nfood and beverage products<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n |
\n 3<\/td>\n | To view restaurant\nmenu<\/td>\n | To check information on\nfood and beverage products<\/td>\n | To view restaurant\nmenu<\/td>\n | To check information on\nfood and beverage products<\/td>\n | To check product authenticity<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n\nSo, is the purpose of the scan of a QR code important? Of course. In rankings, UK respondents scan more often for more information about a product. Meanwhile, respondents in France, Brazil, and the US rank product authentication as the more important use case. While Germans were most likely to scan for authentication only. Knowing these consumer priorities can help companies determine when and how to use, as well as, where to place their QR codes; and how to communicate with consumers about the purpose of those codes.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n <\/div>\n\n \n What should a QR code look like to get the most scans?\n <\/h2>\n\n\nIndeed, there are many ways to design a QR code: black and white, with color, with or without a logo, with a number code below or without. But is the design that important? Consumers very much judge a book by its cover. And in the case of QR codes, the simpler the better, and the\u00a0more trustworthy<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n \n Insight: Seemingly small QR code design details can impact consumer\u2019s willingness to scan in surprising ways\n <\/h4>\n\n\n\n \n Type of QR code most likely to be scanned per country\t<\/caption>\n \n \n <\/th>\n | USA<\/th>\n | UK<\/th>\n | BR<\/th>\n | DE<\/th>\n | FR<\/th>\n <\/tr>\n <\/thead>\n | \n \n Code<\/td>\n | regular<\/td>\n | serialized<\/td>\n | regular<\/td>\n | regular<\/td>\n | regular<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n | \n % of votes\t<\/td>\n | 66.9%\t<\/td>\n | 70.7%\t<\/td>\n | 74.3%\t<\/td>\n | 81.6%\t<\/td>\n | 72.2%\n<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n | \n \n |